What does a bank’s return of $250,000 mean in the scope of the winter bonds story in Oklahoma?

The impact of a reimbursement of $250,000 by a bank that overcharged for its underwriting of winter storm bonds for an Oklahoma utility.

What does it mean. Scott Mitchell and Jerry Bohnen talk about it in their latest edition of Mitchell Talks Energy. Just click the start arrow and listen to their lively discussion.

The post What does a bank’s return of $250,000 mean in the scope of the winter bonds story in Oklahoma? first appeared on Oklahoma Energy Today.